Journal of Professional Nursing
Volume 20, Issue 2 , Pages 118-128, March 2004

Strengths and weaknesses of faculty teaching performance reported by undergraduate and graduate nursing students: a descriptive study

  • Zane Robinson Wolf, PhD, RN

      Affiliations

    • Dean and Professor, La Salle University School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Wolf: La Salle University School of Nursing, 1900 West Olney Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19141 USA
  • ,
  • Pamela J Bender, MSN, RN

      Affiliations

    • Graduate Assistant, La Salle University School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA
  • ,
  • Janice M Beitz, PhD, RN, CNOR, CWOCN, CS

      Affiliations

    • Director of Nursing Certificate and Distributive Learning Program, La Salle University School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA
  • ,
  • Diane M Wieland, PhD, RN, CS

      Affiliations

    • Undergraduate Nursing Program Director, La Salle University School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA
  • ,
  • Kathleen O Vito, DNSc, RN

      Affiliations

    • Graduate Nursing Program Director, La Salle University School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Abstract 

The purpose of this study was to describe the patterns of strengths and weaknesses of faculty teaching performance as reported by undergraduate and graduate nursing students on a narrative section of a university faculty evaluation form. The study used a descriptive, retrospective, qualitative design. The summary forms represented a convenience sample of undergraduate and graduate nursing course sections (N = 317) taught by full-time and part-time nursing faculty from spring 1998 through fall 2002, including summer sessions. Course sections represented didactic and clinical education experiences. Content analysis was used to interpret the recorded comments representing strengths and weaknesses in faculty performance from students’ perspectives. Patterns and associated themes were derived. Faculty performance strengths included patterns such as being a knowledgeable and strategic teacher, creating a positive learning environment, demonstrating professionalism, displaying scholarly traits, and being supportive. Weaknesses included patterns such as poor delivery of content, acting disorganized, being inaccessible, displaying weak teaching skills, being dishonorable, being unprofessional, and displaying negative traits. Implications for continuous quality improvement in teaching/learning processes are presented.

Keywords:  Faculty teaching performance, Strengths, Weaknesses

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S8755-7223(04)00030-4

doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2004.03.003

Journal of Professional Nursing
Volume 20, Issue 2 , Pages 118-128, March 2004