Journal of Professional Nursing
Volume 21, Issue 5 , Pages 314-321, September 2005

Program Evaluation in Graduate Nursing Education: Hardiness as a Predictor of Success Among Nursing Administration Students

  • Sharon Judkins, PhD, RN, CNAA, BC

      Affiliations

    • Director, Nursing Administration Program, and Assistant Professor, School of Nursing, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Judkins: Director, Nursing Administration Program and Assistant Professor, School of Nursing, University of Texas at Arlington, Box 19407, Arlington, Texas 76019-0407.
  • ,
  • Latonia Arris, RN, MSN, BC

      Affiliations

    • Central Texas Veterans Health Care System, Temple, TX
  • ,
  • Elizabeth Keener, RN, MSN, BC

      Affiliations

    • Central Texas Veterans Health Care System, Temple, TX

In an effort to develop meaningful program evaluation data, this exploratory study examined hardiness and stress among a select group of graduate nursing administration students at The University of Texas at Arlington in Arlington, TX. Students completed a questionnaire, which included the Hardiness Scale and Perceived Stress Scale, at both beginning and end of their program. Six to 12 months after graduation, each participant completed a telephone survey with items related to hardiness and American Association of Colleges of Nursing and American Organization of Nurse Executives core competencies. Mean scores for both hardiness and stress did improve from beginning to end of program; however, alpha coefficient reliabilities were disappointing, so no further quantitative analyses were completed. Most enlightening were the telephone interviews, which revealed that graduates were engaged in behaviors indicative of high hardiness. Use of hardiness as a guiding construct may prove useful to nursing administration program faculty in developing and refining a quality program; use of both quantitative and qualitative methods are recommended for obtaining meaningful program evaluation data.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S8755-7223(05)00101-8

doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2005.07.003

Journal of Professional Nursing
Volume 21, Issue 5 , Pages 314-321, September 2005