Journal of Professional Nursing
Volume 23, Issue 3 , Pages 137-143, May 2007

Advanced Health Assessment in Nurse Practitioner Programs: Follow-Up Study

  • Frances J. Kelley, PhD, APRN, BC

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Director Family Nurse Practitioner Program, Georgetown University School of Nursing & Health Studies, Washington, DC
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Kelley: Associate Professor, Director Family Nurse Practitioner Program, Georgetown University School of Nursing & Health Studies, Box 571107, 3700 Reservoir Road, NW, Washington, DC 20057-1107.
  • ,
  • Catharine A. Kopac, PhD, RN, GNP

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Georgetown University School of Nursing & Health Studies, Washington, DC
  • ,
  • John Rosselli, MS, RN, FNP

      Affiliations

    • Graduate Teaching Assistant, Georgetown University School of Nursing & Health Studies, Washington, DC

The increase in advanced practice graduate programs and the inclusion of content and skills related to advanced health assessment as a core competency for practice served as the impetus for a 5-year follow-up study to track the changes, methodologies, and integration of technology into practitioner programs. The questionnaire was mailed to the faculty/schools listed as current members in the National Health Service Corps Nurse Practitioner Faculty Advocate Network. The number of responding schools was 135 (44%). The family nurse practitioner program continues to be the most offered advanced practice nursing program. Nearly all institutions offer a post-master's program and an advanced health assessment course to their clinical graduate students. Health assessment is usually taught concurrently or as a prerequisite for clinical experiences; there continues to be a strong emphasis on the physical examination component. Ethnic and cultural assessment and gerontological assessment content increased since the original study. Both class and laboratory class sizes decreased. Qualitative data that centered on differences in graduate versus undergraduate health assessment revealed a shift in focus in several areas: differential diagnoses, abnormals, and the inclusion of advanced skills. There was an emergence of more creative strategies: the use of standardized patients, online coursework, videotaping, “live” patients, and simulations.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S8755-7223(06)00195-5

doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2006.12.005

Journal of Professional Nursing
Volume 23, Issue 3 , Pages 137-143, May 2007